|
Detecting and Reducing Allergy Triggers by Educating and Assisting Residents to Manage Risks from Pests and Pesticide use: Application of IPM Methods in Boston Housingby Don Rivard President & Bryan GlascockandRegulating Pesticides under the Act to Protect Family and Children: Some Considerations of the Integrated Pest Management Methodsby Brad Mitchell
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Detecting and Reducing Allergy Triggers by Educating and Assisting Residents to Manage Risks from Pests and Pesticide use: Application of IPM Methods in Boston Housing Don Rivard Bryan Glascock Summary: Risks associated with use of chemicals in indoor settings have begun to figure prominently in the medical and risk reduction community as administrators and public health officials strive to find solutions to the epidemic increase of asthma rates among urban families. Appropriately, the Commonwealth has looked to innovative efforts that are combining resources among the state, city and academia to address these concerns from a variety of approaches. IPM is one option. The City of Boston Environment Department has been interested in integrated pest management (IPM) in their efforts to address pest control, indoor air quality and toxic use reduction issues for over ten years. After numerous attempts at obtaining grant funding for a pilot project, the City was finally funded through the EPA. But the City's rationale for IPM extends beyond the reduction of toxics use, (the value of which has not be calculated and, it is argued, need not be). There exist many other compelling reasons for the City to pursue IPM and other "environmental" policies. The proper application of IPM techniques has much in common with other "good government" initiatives such as performance contracting and interdepartmental coordination and can lead to cost savings, reduced liability and increased efficiency. But most importantly, the City's IPM program is an important component of an overall effort to improve quality of life for residents of public housing by improving their overall health, reducing asthma and other respiratory triggers from their immediate environment and empowering them in making healthy choices in their daily lives. By describing the IPM project, we will discuss risk analysis considerations in administrative decision-making and the constraints inherent in environmental problem solving on a local level.
Biographies: Donald Rivard (donrivard22@comast.net
177 Seminole Avenue Waltham, MA 02451-0859 Tel: (617) 968-5330 Fax: (617)
642-0693) David Bryan Glascock, JD, MPA (Bryan.Glascock@
CI.Boston.ma.us, Environmental Department City of Boston (617) 635-4416) Regulating Pesticides under the Act to Protect Family and Children: Some Considerations of the Integrated Pest Management MethodsBrad Mitchell
Summary: Brad Mitchell will speak on the Integrated Pest Management Approach relative to risk assessment and risk management, highlighting experience internationally as well as his work here in Massachusetts. A brief presentation on the Act to Protect Children and Families from Harmful Pesticides will also be given.
Biography: Brad Mitchell is the Director of Regulatory Services for the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture, overseeing the Pesticide Bureau and the Bureau of Farm Products and Plant Industries. He is also chair of the State Reclamation and Mosquito Control Board. Previously he served as both the Chief and Toxicologist for the Pesticide Bureau. |
||||||||||
|
|